Originally Posted by
Will_S
Everyone knows that language is constantly changing, and usages that may once have been completely out of the question come to be accepted as perfectly correct. One of my favorite books, Garner's Modern American Usage, has a fun feature called the "Language Change Index," which it applies to thousands of usages, spellings, etc., that are somewhere on the spectrum. It has five stages:
Stage 1: Rejected (Such as access misused for excess)
Stage 2: Widely Shunned (Such as alot for a lot)
Stage 3: Widespread but... (Such as antivenom for antivenin) I had no idea! I thought it was antivenom all the way!
Stage 4: Ubiquitous but... (Such as anxious for eager)
Stage 5: Fully accepted (Such as balding, which was a new--and controversial--word in the early 20th century)
Does anyone else have an example of an accepted usage that was once considered incorrect? Or a pet-peeve usage that they disapprove of?